US Election Assistance Commission & the ES&S Optical Scanning System
14 December 2015
(Printable PDF)
(Back to Maine RCV/optscan < Electronic Voting < Elections < Issues < Home)
[Note: The two EAC documents copied below relate to problems -- uncovered by The Cleveland Plain Dealer and others -- that escaped the EAC's formal certification testing. They may have been settled, but the fact that this can happen has not changed.] |
Contents EAC Issues Formal Investigation Report on DS200 Precinct Count Optical Scanner Quality Monitoring Program System Advisory Notices Formal Investigations |
EAC Issues Formal Investigation Report on EAC has issued its Formal Investigation Report regarding the Election Systems & Software (ES&S) DS200 Precinct Count Optical Scanner in the EAC-certified Unity 3.2.0.0 voting system. The conclusion is that three of the four anomalies that were originally identified are substantiated. The next steps are 1) a manufacturer site audit to evaluate testing and quality assurance practices and 2) issuance of a Notice of Noncompliance. The three substantiated anomalies are:
The manufacturer will have the opportunity to respond to the report and provide additional information if necessary. For more information about the process, please see the Voting System Testing and Certification Manual. The investigation was initiated by EAC as a result of information contained in an article in The Cleveland Plain Dealer published on April 14, 2010, about a freeze/ shutdown issue experienced in Cuyahoga County, Ohio during pre-election testing. Section 7.4 of the EAC Voting System Testing and Certification Program Manual outlines the process for conducting a formal investigation. For more information, please see the Formal Investigation Report. Jurisdictions using EAC certified voting systems are identified on the website here. The Process The investigation process is initiated when EAC receives information that a voting system may not be in compliance with the applicable voting system standard or EAC certification program requirements. Upon receipt of such information, EAC initiates an Informal Inquiry to determine the credibility of the information. If the information is credible and suggests the system is non-compliant, a Formal Investigation is initiated. If the results of the Formal Investigation demonstrate non-compliance, the Manufacturer is provided a Notice of Non-Compliance. Before a final decision on decertification is made, the Manufacturer will have the opportunity to remedy any defects identified in the voting system and present any additional information for consideration by the EAC.
Quality Monitoring Program
EAC's Quality Monitoring Program is designed to ensure that voting systems certified by EAC are the same systems sold by manufacturers. The quality monitoring process is a mandatory part of the program and includes elements such as fielded voting system review, anomaly reporting, and manufacturing site visits. For more information see Chapter 8 of the Voting System Testing and Certification Program Manual. System Advisory Notices are an important part of the Quality Monitoring Program. EAC issues advisories to inform jurisdictions and members of the public of an existing anomaly or issue with an EAC-certified system. The advisory notice describes the nature of the issue identified, the root cause of the issue if known, and the current status of a solution to the issue. EAC will follow up with additional advisory notices regarding unresolved issues as more information is gathered and the problem is resolved. Sign up for automatic system advisory alerts. These notices support EAC's quality monitoring program requirement related to identifying and reporting anomalies of fielded EAC systems. These notices are issued after an anomaly or issue is identified and verified through conversations with the jurisdiction fielding the system and the manufacturer of the system. See below the System Advisory Notices that EAC has issued, or visit the Resource Library. ...[vendors other than ES&S omitted here]...
[vendors other than ES&S omitted here] A Formal Investigation is an official investigation of a non-conformity to a voting system. The end result of a Formal Investigation is a Report of Investigation. For more information see Chapter 7 of the Voting System Testing and Certification Program Manual. See below the Formal Investigations that EAC has issued, or visit the Resource Library. Election Systems and Software [the only vendor they've formally investigated] Unity 3.2.0.0 |